Terry Richardson Gets Down and Dirty for Purple Magazine

By Isabelle Raphael 07 Sep 2009 @ 7:52 am | Categorized EDITORIAL |

Look who’s up to his old tricks again, gallivanting around with beautiful naked women. The soon-to-be married Terry Richardson does not shy away from the stunning Eniko Mihalik, Freja Beha, Magdalena Frackowiak, and Abbey Lee Kershaw during the shoot for Purple Fashion Magazine Fall/Winter 2009 (styled by Christopher Niquet).

Via Touch Puppet

Pin It

TAGS: Abbey Lee Kershaw, Christopher Niquet, Eniko Mihalik, Fall/Winter 2009, Fashion, Freja Beha, Magazine, Magdalena Frackowiak, purple magazine, Shoot, Terry Richardson

Written by:

Isabelle Raphael - who posted 54 articles on Trendland.
I am a photo editor and a blogger and spend my days scouring the internet so you don't have to
Contact the author

http://zubeir.co.za/ Z
Terry Richardson is my hero
http://www.blank-label.com/ Blank Label
not for nothing, but this shoot kinda seems trashy. i think it's the women that are really not doing it for me. their crazy hair and facial expressions are really turning me off to the whole shoot. i can appreciate naked women, but this just doesnt seem good. perhaps this shoot would be better if the women didnt look so scary
LoganWolfe
Has anyone ever heard of Helmut Newton?
http://www.CyanaBoutique.com Cyril Style
Of course we Know him, but you know, he is a little bit the father of Sexy Photography… so of course terry or jurgen got some inspiration form him…
http://auroracrowley.com/ Aurora
Newton has more class>>>>>> however long live Terry for pushing the boundaries
Pingback: Petite Lines -la semana en líneas- « La Petite Cecile – A blog about Fashion, Style & Trends
victor
nice photography with so beautiful models,carry on.good luck.It is better if u give names of the models below the photographs. Thanks & regards
Pingback: SWURDIN | HMM: TERRY RICHARDSON A PERVERT?
Pingback: The Obvious about Terry Richardson | TrendLand -> Fashion Blog & Trend Magazine
Gentry
This is not right on any level. Go ahead and fault me for stating what art is not. This is not art. For one, because art should not objectify anyone, man or woman. Hopefully more truth will surface concerning Richardson’s deviant behavior. I challenge anyone to defend any behavior that exploits women. Allegations against Richardson come from consenting young women who now regret their actions, but many of them were talked into doing certain less than wholesome things on their photo shoots. I don’t think anyone can defend Richardson’s actions. He has even admitted to exploiting girls. This kind of stuff needs to stop sooner than later for the sake of art, society, and women.
MadG
This isn’t art.It’s just porn dressed up as fashion.And it’s not even good photography…all of this has been done before.How can the fashion world put this kind of has-been rubbish on a pedastal?
Pingback: The Infamous Terry Richardson |
Jason
Okay, I don’t care if terry shoots nudes or anything but seriously… most the work coming out of the guy is just utter shit photography… Although I’ve seen some pretty good thigns come out of this guy but half of the shit is… well shit at its best.